tes berdasarkan buku «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
Sponsor

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Ketakutan

Negara
Bahasa
-
Mail
Hitung ulang
Nilai kritis dari koefisien korelasi
Distribusi normal, oleh William Sealy Gosset (siswa) r = 0.0317
Distribusi normal, oleh William Sealy Gosset (siswa) r = 0.0317
Distribusi non normal, oleh Spearman r = 0.0013
DistribusiTidak
normal
Tidak
normal
Tidak
normal
NormalNormalNormalNormalNormal
Semua pertanyaan
Semua pertanyaan
Ketakutan terbesar saya adalah
Ketakutan terbesar saya adalah
Answer 1-
Positif lemah
0.0514
Positif lemah
0.0257
Negatif lemah
-0.0189
Positif lemah
0.0957
Positif lemah
0.0372
Negatif lemah
-0.0163
Negatif lemah
-0.1534
Answer 2-
Positif lemah
0.0181
Negatif lemah
-0.0063
Negatif lemah
-0.0383
Positif lemah
0.0668
Positif lemah
0.0501
Positif lemah
0.0107
Negatif lemah
-0.0971
Answer 3-
Negatif lemah
-0.0033
Negatif lemah
-0.0100
Negatif lemah
-0.0434
Negatif lemah
-0.0436
Positif lemah
0.0487
Positif lemah
0.0757
Negatif lemah
-0.0220
Answer 4-
Positif lemah
0.0424
Positif lemah
0.0266
Negatif lemah
-0.0231
Positif lemah
0.0171
Positif lemah
0.0363
Positif lemah
0.0236
Negatif lemah
-0.0984
Answer 5-
Positif lemah
0.0230
Positif lemah
0.1264
Positif lemah
0.0120
Positif lemah
0.0758
Positif lemah
0.0001
Negatif lemah
-0.0172
Negatif lemah
-0.1776
Answer 6-
Negatif lemah
-0.0045
Positif lemah
0.0040
Negatif lemah
-0.0611
Negatif lemah
-0.0087
Positif lemah
0.0256
Positif lemah
0.0854
Negatif lemah
-0.0362
Answer 7-
Positif lemah
0.0091
Positif lemah
0.0330
Negatif lemah
-0.0646
Negatif lemah
-0.0297
Positif lemah
0.0530
Positif lemah
0.0690
Negatif lemah
-0.0538
Answer 8-
Positif lemah
0.0637
Positif lemah
0.0703
Negatif lemah
-0.0252
Positif lemah
0.0131
Positif lemah
0.0387
Positif lemah
0.0165
Negatif lemah
-0.1346
Answer 9-
Positif lemah
0.0717
Positif lemah
0.1588
Positif lemah
0.0067
Positif lemah
0.0635
Negatif lemah
-0.0075
Negatif lemah
-0.0487
Negatif lemah
-0.1827
Answer 10-
Positif lemah
0.0746
Positif lemah
0.0642
Negatif lemah
-0.0141
Positif lemah
0.0289
Positif lemah
0.0333
Negatif lemah
-0.0137
Negatif lemah
-0.1356
Answer 11-
Positif lemah
0.0629
Positif lemah
0.0510
Negatif lemah
-0.0087
Positif lemah
0.0101
Positif lemah
0.0266
Positif lemah
0.0238
Negatif lemah
-0.1271
Answer 12-
Positif lemah
0.0440
Positif lemah
0.0924
Negatif lemah
-0.0325
Positif lemah
0.0316
Positif lemah
0.0326
Positif lemah
0.0256
Negatif lemah
-0.1534
Answer 13-
Positif lemah
0.0705
Positif lemah
0.0949
Negatif lemah
-0.0390
Positif lemah
0.0288
Positif lemah
0.0422
Positif lemah
0.0146
Negatif lemah
-0.1634
Answer 14-
Positif lemah
0.0795
Positif lemah
0.0892
Negatif lemah
-0.0007
Negatif lemah
-0.0110
Positif lemah
0.0062
Positif lemah
0.0129
Negatif lemah
-0.1228
Answer 15-
Positif lemah
0.0548
Positif lemah
0.1260
Negatif lemah
-0.0332
Positif lemah
0.0119
Negatif lemah
-0.0152
Positif lemah
0.0234
Negatif lemah
-0.1154
Answer 16-
Positif lemah
0.0715
Positif lemah
0.0229
Negatif lemah
-0.0369
Negatif lemah
-0.0405
Positif lemah
0.0729
Positif lemah
0.0165
Negatif lemah
-0.0770


Ekspor ke MS Excel
Fungsi ini akan tersedia dalam jajak pendapat VUCA Anda sendiri
Oke

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
Valerii Kosenko
Pemilik Produk SaaS SDTEST®

Valerii memperoleh kualifikasi sebagai psikolog-pedagog sosial pada tahun 1993 dan sejak itu menerapkan pengetahuannya dalam manajemen proyek.
Valerii memperoleh gelar Master dan kualifikasi manajer proyek dan program pada tahun 2013. Selama program Masternya, ia mengenal Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e.V.) dan Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii adalah penulis yang mengeksplorasi ketidakpastian V.U.C.A. konsep menggunakan Dinamika Spiral dan statistik matematika dalam psikologi, dan 38 jajak pendapat internasional.
Posting ini memiliki 0 Komentar
Membalas ke
Batalkan balasan
tinggalkan Komentar Anda
×
ANDA MENCARI AN ERROR
USULAN VERSION BENAR ANDA
Masukkan e-mail Anda seperti yang diinginkan
Kirim
Membatalkan
Bot
sdtest
1
Hai, yang di sana! Izinkan saya bertanya kepada Anda, apakah Anda sudah terbiasa dengan dinamika spiral?