كىتاب ئاساسىدا سىناق «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
قوللىغۇچىلار

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


قورقۇنچ

دۆلەت
تىل
-
Mail
قايتا ھېسابلاش
مۇناسىۋەتلىك كوئېففىتسېنتى ھالقىلىق قىممىتى
نورمال تەقسىملەش, ۋىليام دېڭىز قىرغىقىدا (ئوقۇغۇچى) r = 0.0318
نورمال تەقسىملەش, ۋىليام دېڭىز قىرغىقىدا (ئوقۇغۇچى) r = 0.0318
نەيزە بىلەن نورمال تەقسىمات ئەمەس r = 0.0013
تەقسىملەشنورمال
ئەمەس
نورمال
ئەمەس
نورمال
ئەمەس
نورمالنورمالنورمالنورمالنورمال
بارلىق سوئاللار
بارلىق سوئاللار
مېنىڭ ئەڭ قورقىدىغىنىم
مېنىڭ ئەڭ قورقىدىغىنىم
Answer 1-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0524
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0258
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0180
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0949
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0355
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0146
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.1537
Answer 2-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0175
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0058
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0387
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0669
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0494
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0116
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0969
Answer 3-
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0035
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0091
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0441
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0435
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0477
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0747
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0199
Answer 4-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0412
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0255
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0229
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0192
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0353
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0246
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0990
Answer 5-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0227
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.1271
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0109
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0770
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0005
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0175
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.1774
Answer 6-
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0055
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0042
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0622
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0080
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0249
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0863
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0354
Answer 7-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0084
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0331
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0656
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0297
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0523
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0696
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0522
Answer 8-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0629
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0710
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0267
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0130
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0379
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0184
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.1339
Answer 9-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0711
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.1602
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0072
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0643
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0106
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0484
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.1819
Answer 10-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0740
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0656
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0150
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0292
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0321
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0123
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.1359
Answer 11-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0629
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0524
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0098
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0104
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0253
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0247
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.1270
Answer 12-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0433
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0921
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0338
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0335
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0331
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0257
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.1540
Answer 13-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0687
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0957
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0396
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0304
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0408
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0151
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.1630
Answer 14-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0781
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0884
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0003
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0096
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0050
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0138
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.1228
Answer 15-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0539
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.1269
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0339
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0148
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0172
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0237
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.1160
Answer 16-
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0690
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0248
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0372
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0385
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0703
ئاجىز مۇسبەت
0.0205
ئاجىز مەنپىي
-0.0792


MS Excel ئېكسپورت
بۇ ئىقتىدار ئۆزىڭىزنىڭ VUCA راي سىناش نەتىجىسىدە بولىدۇ
Ok

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
ۋالېرىي كوسېنكو
مەھسۇلات ئىگىسى SaaS SDTEST®

ۋالېرىي 1993-يىلى ئىجتىمائىي پېداگوگىكا-پىسخولوگ سالاھىيىتىگە ئېرىشكەن ۋە شۇنىڭدىن كېيىن ئۆزىنىڭ بىلىملىرىنى تۈر باشقۇرۇشتا قوللانغان.
ۋالېرىي 2013-يىلى ماگىستىرلىق ئۇنۋانى ۋە تۈر ۋە پروگرامما دېرىكتورى سالاھىيىتىگە ئېرىشكەن. ماگىستىرلىق پروگراممىسىدا ئۇ Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) ۋە Spiral Dynamics بىلەن تونۇشقان.
ۋالېرىي V.U.C.A نىڭ ئېنىقسىزلىقى ئۈستىدە ئىزدىنىشنىڭ ئاپتورى. پىسخولوگىيەدىكى Spiral Dynamics ۋە ماتېماتىكىلىق ستاتىستىكا ۋە 38 خەلقئارالىق راي سىناش ئارقىلىق ئۇقۇم.
بۇ يازما بار 0 باھا
جاۋاب
جاۋابنى بىكار قىلىڭ
باھايىڭىزنى قالدۇرۇڭ
×
سىز خاتالىق تېپىپ
سىزنىڭ توغرا نۇسخىسى ئوتتۇرىغا
لازىملىق سىزنىڭ ئې-خەت كىرگۈزۈڭ
ئۇچۇر يوللاش
болмайдиған қилмақ
Bot
sdtest
1
ئەسسالامۇئەلەيكۇم! سىزدىن سوراپ باقاي, سىز spiral janamics بىلەن بىلەمسىز?