Grāmata balstīta tests «Spiral Dynamics:
Mastering Values, Leadership, and
Change» (ISBN-13: 978-1405133562)
Sponsors

Psychological Analysis of Fear-Based Healthcare Messaging: Comparing HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Through the Lens of Spiral Dynamics

Dr. Tomás Campbell [1], a member of the BPS Division of Clinical Psychology Faculty for HIV and Sexual Health, article "Towards more inclusive and Empowering Healthcare Campaigns" [2] presents a compelling analysis of the evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging over four decades, tracing a path from fear-based approaches to more empowering, inclusive strategies. This progression reflects significant advances in both medical understanding and psychological approaches to public health communication. 

The SDTEST® survey data on fears provides an excellent opportunity to examine how these evolving messaging strategies align with contemporary fear psychology and value systems as described by Spiral Dynamics theory.


Comparative Analysis of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 Fear Prevalence


The SDTEST® survey "Fears" involving 3,679 participants across 105 countries reveals that HIV/AIDS now ranks relatively low at 4%, while COVID-19 ranks even lower at just 2%. Below is a abridged version of the survey results. The full results are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


Bailes

valsts
valoda
-
Mail
Pārrēķināt
Kritiskais vērtību korelācijas koeficienta
Normāla izplatīšana, autors Viljams Sealijs Gossets (students) r = 0.0318
Normāla izplatīšana, autors Viljams Sealijs Gossets (students) r = 0.0318
Non parasts sadalījums, autors Spearman r = 0.0013
SadalījumsNenormālsNenormālsNenormālsNormālsNormālsNormālsNormālsNormāls
Visi jautājumi
Visi jautājumi
Mana lielākā bailes ir
Mana lielākā bailes ir
Answer 1-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0524
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0258
Vāja negatīva
-0.0180
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0949
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0355
Vāja negatīva
-0.0146
Vāja negatīva
-0.1537
Answer 2-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0175
Vāja negatīva
-0.0058
Vāja negatīva
-0.0387
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0669
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0494
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0116
Vāja negatīva
-0.0969
Answer 3-
Vāja negatīva
-0.0035
Vāja negatīva
-0.0091
Vāja negatīva
-0.0441
Vāja negatīva
-0.0435
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0477
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0747
Vāja negatīva
-0.0199
Answer 4-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0412
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0255
Vāja negatīva
-0.0229
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0192
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0353
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0246
Vāja negatīva
-0.0990
Answer 5-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0227
Vāji pozitīvi
0.1271
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0109
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0770
Vāja negatīva
-0.0005
Vāja negatīva
-0.0175
Vāja negatīva
-0.1774
Answer 6-
Vāja negatīva
-0.0055
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0042
Vāja negatīva
-0.0622
Vāja negatīva
-0.0080
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0249
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0863
Vāja negatīva
-0.0354
Answer 7-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0084
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0331
Vāja negatīva
-0.0656
Vāja negatīva
-0.0297
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0523
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0696
Vāja negatīva
-0.0522
Answer 8-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0629
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0710
Vāja negatīva
-0.0267
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0130
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0379
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0184
Vāja negatīva
-0.1339
Answer 9-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0711
Vāji pozitīvi
0.1602
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0072
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0643
Vāja negatīva
-0.0106
Vāja negatīva
-0.0484
Vāja negatīva
-0.1819
Answer 10-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0740
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0656
Vāja negatīva
-0.0150
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0292
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0321
Vāja negatīva
-0.0123
Vāja negatīva
-0.1359
Answer 11-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0629
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0524
Vāja negatīva
-0.0098
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0104
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0253
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0247
Vāja negatīva
-0.1270
Answer 12-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0433
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0921
Vāja negatīva
-0.0338
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0335
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0331
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0257
Vāja negatīva
-0.1540
Answer 13-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0687
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0957
Vāja negatīva
-0.0396
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0304
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0408
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0151
Vāja negatīva
-0.1630
Answer 14-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0781
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0884
Vāja negatīva
-0.0003
Vāja negatīva
-0.0096
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0050
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0138
Vāja negatīva
-0.1228
Answer 15-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0539
Vāji pozitīvi
0.1269
Vāja negatīva
-0.0339
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0148
Vāja negatīva
-0.0172
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0237
Vāja negatīva
-0.1160
Answer 16-
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0690
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0248
Vāja negatīva
-0.0372
Vāja negatīva
-0.0385
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0703
Vāji pozitīvi
0.0205
Vāja negatīva
-0.0792


Eksportēt uz MS Excel
Šī funkcija būs pieejama jūsu VUCA aptaujās
Labi

This modest fear prevalence contrasts sharply with the historical positioning of HIV/AIDS as a primary existential threat during the 1980s-90s. As the article aptly notes, early HIV/AIDS campaigns relied heavily on fear-based messaging, leveraging protection-motivation theory to drive behavioral change through graphic depictions of mortality and disease. The current survey results suggest these diseases have been partially normalized in the public consciousness, supporting the article's observation that medical advancements have transformed HIV from a death sentence to a manageable chronic condition.


When examining broader fear contexts, it's noteworthy that personal concerns about "illness of relatives and children" (11%) and general "illness" (8%) outrank specific disease fears like HIV/AIDS or COVID-19. This pattern indicates that abstract illness threats generate more anxiety than particular diseases that have been subject to extensive public education campaigns. This finding aligns with the article's discussion of how healthcare messaging has evolved toward destigmatization and normalization, particularly for HIV/AIDS.


Spiral Dynamics Correlations: Understanding Value Systems and Fear Responses


The correlation data between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provides fascinating insights into how different value systems engage with health threats. HIV/AIDS shows a positive correlation (0.0662) with Orange-level thinking, which represents achievement-oriented, strategic value systems. This alignment makes psychological sense, as Orange thinking prioritizes personal agency and risk management. Individuals operating from this value system may respond more actively to diseases perceived as consequences of personal behavior choices.


Conversely, HIV/AIDS fears correlate negatively with Yellow (-0.0516) and more strongly with Turquoise (-0.1776) value systems. These second-tier thinking systems in Spiral Dynamics represent more complex, integrative worldviews that may contextualize disease within a broader systemic understanding. The stronger negative correlation with Turquoise thinking is particularly notable, as this holistic perspective tends to integrate mortality and vulnerability into a comprehensive worldview, potentially reducing fear responses to specific conditions.


For COVID-19, the correlation pattern differs significantly. The positive correlation with Green thinking (0.0637) suggests that communitarian, egalitarian value systems may experience heightened concern about highly communicable diseases that threaten community well-being. This aligns with the article's discussion of how modern healthcare campaigns increasingly emphasize collective responsibility and community protection. The negative correlations with Blue (-0.0342), Orange (-0.0409), and Turquoise (-0.0748) value systems suggest varied psychological responses across the spiral.


Implications for Evolving Healthcare Messaging


The article chronicles a shift from fear-based campaigns toward empowerment and behavioral strategies, noting how psychological frameworks like self-efficacy theory and social norm theory have informed this evolution. The SDTEST® data supports the efficacy of this shift by demonstrating relatively low fear ratings for HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigma. This suggests that destigmatizing, empowering messaging approaches may have successfully normalized the condition in public consciousness.


The varying correlations between fears and Spiral Dynamics stages also validate the article's emphasis on intersectionality and tailored messaging. Different value systems appear to process disease threats through distinct psychological frameworks, which has significant implications for public health communication. The article notes that "campaigns are now much more carefully designed to address diverse populations," which aligns with the need to consider value system diversity in designing effective interventions.


Advancing Psychologically Informed Healthcare Communications


The relatively weak correlation between disease fears and specific Spiral Dynamics stages (with the critical value of the correlation coefficient for a normal distribution, by William Sealy Gosset (Student) r = 0.0323) suggests that fears of HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 transcend value systems but manifest differently within them. This finding supports the article's conclusion that messaging must "remain effective, compassionate, and mindful of nuance." The positive correlation between HIV/AIDS fears and Orange thinking, contrasted with COVID-19's positive correlation with Green thinking, demonstrates how different diseases activate different value concerns.


The article's discussion of digital and social media platforms as vectors for modern healthcare messaging presents opportunities for even more targeted value-specific communications. Understanding the psychological frameworks through which different Spiral Dynamics stages process health information could enable micro-targeted campaigns that resonate more effectively with diverse audiences. For instance, messaging aimed at Orange-dominant thinkers might emphasize personal agency and achievement in health management, while Green-focused messaging might highlight community protection and collective responsibility.


Conclusion


The evolution of HIV/AIDS messaging described in the article reflects a sophisticated understanding of psychological principles, moving from protection-motivation theory toward self-efficacy and social norm approaches. The SDTEST® data validates this progression by showing relatively modest contemporary fear responses to HIV/AIDS despite its historical stigmatization. The correlation patterns between disease fears and Spiral Dynamics stages provide valuable insights for further refining healthcare communications to resonate with different value systems.


The comparative data between HIV/AIDS and COVID-19 fears, particularly their different correlation patterns with Spiral Dynamics stages, suggests that disease characteristics interact with value systems to produce distinct psychological responses. As the article argues, effective healthcare campaigns must continue to evolve based on evidence rather than prejudice. The SDTEST® data offers this evidence, demonstrating how fears of specific conditions correlate with different psychological frameworks and value systems.


This integration of fear psychology, mathematical correlation, and Spiral Dynamics theory provides a robust foundation for developing increasingly sophisticated, psychologically informed healthcare messaging strategies that can effectively engage diverse populations across the spiral of human development.



Sources

[1] https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-campbell-40202785/
[2] https://www.bps.org.uk/blog/towards-more-inclusive-and-empowering-healthcare-campaigns


2025.02.28
Valerii Kosenko
Produkta īpašnieks SaaS SDTEST®

Valērijs 1993. gadā ieguva sociālā pedagoga-psihologa kvalifikāciju un kopš tā laika ir pielietojis savas zināšanas projektu vadībā.
Valērijs 2013. gadā ieguva maģistra grādu un projektu un programmu vadītāja kvalifikāciju. Maģistra programmas laikā viņš iepazinās ar Project Roadmap (GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e. V.) un Spiral Dynamics.
Valerii ir V.U.C.A. nenoteiktības izpētes autors. koncepcija, izmantojot spirālveida dinamiku un matemātisko statistiku psiholoģijā, un 38 starptautiskas aptaujas.
Šim amatam ir 0 Komentāri
Atbildēt uz
Atcelt atbildi
Atstājiet savu komentāru
×
Atrodat kļūdu
Informējiet par pareizo versiju
Ievadiet savu e-pasta adresi, kā vēlamo
Sūtīt
atcelt
Bot
sdtest
1
Sveiki! Ļaujiet man jums jautāt, vai jūs jau esat pazīstams ar spirāles dinamiku?