Feathered Correlations: Color Predicting Culture in Diverse Flocks After Disaster

There were once colorful flocks of birds that lived together in a big forest. These flocks of birds had different ratios of beige birds, purple birds, red birds, blue birds, orange birds, green birds, yellow birds, and turquoise birds. These different proportions of colors influenced each flock's values, culture, and atmosphere. Their leaders made decisions based on the most common bird colors.


One day, after a bad storm, the flock leaders made tough choices to help their birds survive.


In Swift's flock, purple and green birds predominated. True to their adventurous nature, Swift sent the purple and green birds to find new food sources (unpaid vacation). She asked the orange birds to scout for materials to rebuild damaged nests because they loved to compete.


Feather's flock mainly had blue, who valued stability, and orange birds, who loved competition. The no-nonsense orange birds got right to work on repairs (no reduced staff). And the peaceful blue birds kept singing to lift spirits, so Feather changed nothing about their routines (nothing changed).  


Hootie's flock had many sociable yellow birds who could always find a profitable solution for everyone and possessed a Win-Win-Win behavior. When the yellow birds' food storage was damaged, instead of reducing their rations (reduced salaries), Hootie asked the red birds to share the extra food they had gathered. So, yellow birds' food storage wasn't changed (no reduced salaries).


Over in Willa's flock, fun-loving turquoise birds were the majority. After the storm, Willa kept all her turquoise birds in their usual nests, singing songs since their cheerfulness helped the whole flock recover (nothing changed). But she had to ask the few red and orange birds to rebuild damaged nests belonging to elder beige birds temporarily.


Each diverse flock recovered based on its colorful culture and connections. But all birds worked cooperatively despite difficulties to continue thriving in the forest.


The SDTEST® gives clues to someone's motivational values. However, additional polls can provide more pieces of the puzzle.


Imagine also giving an "Actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month (yes / no)" poll. It asks people about actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month. 


Now imagine 1'000 people who took both tests. You could match up each person's SDTEST® colors with their answers about actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month.


Comparing tests gives an expanded picture of values in action. More puzzle pieces make the whole image more apparent!


Multiple tests can work together, like colors blending on a palette. Other polls reveal what engages your values, like what is the perception of the actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month. Combined, they paint a richer picture of what motivates our thoughts and deeds.


Below you can read an abridged version of the results of our VUCA poll "Actions of companies in relation to personnel in the last month (yes / no)". The full results of the poll are available for free in the FAQ section after login or registration.


上個月與人員有關的公司的行動(是 /否)

Country
Lang
-
Mail
重新計算
Critical_value_of_the_correlation_coefficient
正態分佈,威廉·西莉·格塞特(William Sealy Gosset)(學生) r = 0.0517
正態分佈,威廉·西莉·格塞特(William Sealy Gosset)(學生) r = 0.0517
非正態分佈,Spearman r = 0.0021
分配非正常普通的非正常普通的普通的普通的普通的普通的
所有問題
所有問題
上個月對員工採取了什麼行動
上個月對員工採取了什麼行動
Answer 1-
Weak_positive
0.1196
Weak_positive
0.0292
Weak_negative
-0.0443
Weak_negative
-0.0944
Weak_positive
0.0384
Weak_positive
0.0236
Weak_negative
-0.0296
Answer 2-
Weak_negative
-0.0028
Weak_negative
-0.0373
Weak_negative
-0.0010
Weak_negative
-0.0121
Weak_negative
-0.0102
Weak_negative
-0.0109
Weak_positive
0.0640
Answer 3-
Weak_positive
0.0294
Weak_negative
-0.0165
Weak_positive
0.0183
Weak_negative
-0.0145
Weak_positive
0.0353
Weak_negative
-0.0365
Weak_negative
-0.0102
Answer 4-
Weak_positive
0.0307
Weak_positive
0.0585
Weak_negative
-0.0085
Weak_negative
-0.0294
Weak_positive
0.0199
Weak_negative
-0.0332
Weak_negative
-0.0178
Answer 5-
Weak_negative
-0.0125
Weak_positive
0.0297
Weak_negative
-0.0381
Weak_positive
0.0168
Weak_positive
0.0254
Weak_negative
-0.0046
Weak_negative
-0.0204
Answer 6-
Weak_negative
-0.0253
Weak_negative
-0.0010
Weak_positive
0.0425
Weak_negative
-0.0080
Weak_negative
-0.0026
Weak_positive
0.0075
Weak_negative
-0.0182
Answer 7-
Weak_positive
0.0239
Weak_positive
0.0341
Weak_negative
-0.0194
Weak_negative
-0.0318
Weak_positive
0.0100
Weak_positive
0.0037
Weak_negative
-0.0054
Answer 8-
Weak_negative
-0.0131
Weak_negative
-0.0016
Weak_negative
-0.0116
Weak_negative
-0.0380
Weak_negative
-0.0341
Weak_positive
0.0656
Weak_positive
0.0337
Answer 9-
Weak_negative
-0.0553
Weak_positive
0.0401
Weak_positive
0.0346
Weak_positive
0.0667
Weak_negative
-0.0559
Weak_negative
-0.0120
Weak_negative
-0.0244


export_to_excel
win_buy_vuca_message
好的


2023.12.09
Valerii Kosenko
產品負責人 SaaS SDTEST®

Valerii 於 1993 年獲得社會教育心理學家資格,此後將他的知識應用於專案管理。
Valerii 於 2013 年獲得碩士學位以及專案和專案經理資格。
Valerii 是探討 V.U.C.A. 不確定性的作者。使用螺旋動力學和心理學數理統計的概念,以及 38 個國際民意調查。
這個帖子有 0 評論
回复
取消答复
發表評論
×
Title_Grammatical_Errors
frm_label_correct_option
frm_label_your_email
send
取消
Bot
sdtest
1
你好呀!讓我問你,您已經熟悉螺旋動態嗎?